Join us for the next webcast of Philosophy in Action, broadcast live this Sunday, 26 February 2012, at 8 am PT / 9 am MT / 10 am CT / 11 am ET. In this week's hour of applying rational principles to the problems of life, we'll answer questions on consent in sex, terminating online versus in-person acquaintances, compensating the victims of your negligence, the meaning of faith, and more. In the meantime, don't forget to submit and vote on questions for upcoming webcasts!

Sex Without Love

Episode: 8 January 2012, Question 2

Is sex without love or romance irrational? Is it wrong to have sex with someone that you don't love – or don't love yet? (Here, assume that the person isn't unworthy, but just that you're not in love.) Couldn't that be the start of romance? What if you don't have any intentions of pursuing a romantic relationship with this person?

My Answer, In Brief: Sex is an inherently intimate act, requiring well-grounded respect, trust, and affection – even if not love.

Listen Now

Relevant Links

Topics

Share This Question

Comment Via Facebook


Support the Webcast

The Philosophy in Action Webcast is available to anyone, free of charge. We love doing it, but it's not free for us to produce: it requires our time, effort, and money. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to the webcast's tip jar!


Connect with Us

Comments? Questions? Want more? Be sure to connect with us via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, RSS, e-mail, and more!